Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study

Science Vol/Iss. 332 American Association for the Advancement of Science New York, Ny Published In Pages: 1100-1104
By Gelfand, Michele J., Raver, Jana L., Nishii, Lisa, Leslie, Lisa M., Lun, Janetta, Lim, Beng Chong, Duan, Lili, Almaliach, Assaf, Ang, Soon, Arnadottir, Jakobina, Aycan, Zeynep, Boehnke, Klaus, Boski, Pawel, Cabecinhas, Rosa, Chan, Darius, Chhokar, Jagdeep, D’Amato, Alessia, Ferrer, Montse, Fischlmayr, Iris C., Fischer, Ronald, Fülöp, Marta, Georgas, James, Kashima, Emiko S., Kashima, Yoshishima, Kim, Kibum, Lempereur, Alain, Marquez, Patricia, Othman, Rozhan, Overlaet, Bert, Panagiotopoulou, Penny, Peltzer, Karl, Perez-Florizno, Lorena R., Ponomarenko, Larisa, Realo, Anu, Schei, Vidar, Schmitt, Manfred, Smith, Peter B., Soomro, Nazar, Szabo, Erna, Taveesin, Nalinee, Toyama, Midori, Van de Vliert, Evert, Vohra, Naharika, Ward, Colleen, Yamaguchi, Susum

Hypothesis

Amount of life lost to communicable diseases is positively correlated with tightness-looseness (p.1101).

Note

The life lost to communicable diseases variable was log-transformed.

Test

Test NameSupportSignificanceCoefficientTail
CorrelationSupportedp<.01.59Two-tailed

Variables

Variable NameVariable Type OCM Term(s)
Death By Communicable DieaseIndependentMorbidity
Tightness-looseness In NormsDependentNorms, Social Control, Sanctions, Social Offenses